Sunday, June 11, 2023

Before MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000, There was the Question of WHAT'S UP TIGER LILY?

This week sees the release of The Worst We Can Find, dealing with Mystery Science Theater 3000, RiffTrax, and the history of riffing at the movies. With the history element in mind, I spend some time in the book discussing earlier films and television shows that had new soundtracks redubbed for older films in order to turn them into comedies. Of course, you can't go down that rabbit hole without bringing up one of the best-remembered of these redubbed films, What's Up, Tiger Lilly? 


This 1966 release was a case of a Hollywood producer named Henry Saperstein having negotiated a deal with Japanese studio Toho to release a number of their giant monster (aka kaiju) movies and help produce some others, including Godzilla vs. Mothra and Frankenstein Conquers the World. In setting up the distribution package, Saperstein also found himself the recipient of a series of spy movies done with Tatsuya Mihashi as secret agent Jiru Kitami. This posed a problem as the spy genre by 1966 was already over-saturated and the series had quickly become very comedic in nature, which didn't translate to American test audiences when Saperstein screened the fourth movies in the series, Key of Keys in a redubbed edition. Instead of excitement, the audience was bored by what was essentially a heist movie, laughing at the serious part, and confused by the comedy that didn't translate very well.


Instead of simply throwing it over to television distribution, Saperstein latched on to the idea of revisiting what worked for Fractured Flickers. That one-season television series from Jay Ward's production company had taken scenes from old movies and redubbed them with new narrative and dialogue to create funny shorts. Saperstein decided that it could be a good fit for Key of Keys and contacted comedian Lenny Bruce to write new dialogue. Bruce was interested until Saperstein made clear that the new dialogue had to be written for a family audience. When Bruce nixed the idea, Saperstein asked him, "Who's a clean you?" Bruce replied, "Woody Allen."

Woody Allen had started as a writer for television and advanced into working in stand-up to the point that he was appearing on various talk-shows and getting work in movies, with writing and co-starring work completed or soon-to-be-completed on What's New, Pussycat? and Casino Royale, while pressing the studios to give him a chance to direct (which he achieved in 1969 with the release of Take the Money and Run). Getting him on board would be a catch for Saperstein that would be easy to promote. Allen was reportedly offered $66,000 to redo the dialogue and he soon gathered a group of friends together in an New York hotel room to repeatedly watch the film and write a new script for what was being promoted in the newspapers as POW! (thus explaining the theme song, which was written before the movie got the title everyone remembers it by).

There have been an established story for many years that Allen completed work on the project with the understanding that it was to be a hour-long television special and nearly sued Saperstein when the producer took the material, added excerpts from a previous movie in the spy series, and songs from the popular band, The Loving Spoonful to make it feature length. However, a more recent interview with editor Richard Krown in 2021 (https://vantagepointinterviews.com/2021/09/14/godzillas-crowning-moment-upas-post-production-supervisor-richard-krown-on-americanizing-toho-classics/) clarifies that Allen was always part of the discussion in extending the material so that it could be released as a theatrical movie. This included the opening material from the previous film, as well as an interview segment segment with Allen explaining the concept of the movie, the Loving Spoonful segments, and a final bit where China Lee does a strip while Allen eats an apple as the credits roll (a bit that hardly would have been a good move for syndicated television in 1966). While there were talks of Allen possibly suing, it appears more to do with how Saperstein advertised the movie, not only tying it into Allen's earlier appearance by calling it What's Up, Tiger Lily?, but advertising it in posters and newspaper ads as Woody Allen's What's Up, Tiger Lily? Coming into the project as a voice-actor and writer, and at the same time still striving to get a deal to make his first "real" movie, the promotion left a bad taste in Allen's mouth. As it turned out, the movie did well enough that Allen was convinced pursing a lawsuit over how the film was promoted would not be a good image for his emerging film career. Still, the rumors lingered for years and Allen has rarely talked about the project since.



The movie would go on to become one that saw regular rotation on television, especially the independent television stations of the 1970s and 1980s, who needed cheap programming and found it in a movie connected to a very popular director of movies in those years. Because of this, many kids grew up watching What's Up, Tiger Lily? and it became the benchmark for how people would describe other attempts (such as J-Men Forever and The Return of Hercules) in the years to come. As would be the case of Mystery Science Theater 3000 when it finally moved to national television at The Comedy Channel. 

But that's a story for the book, as is more details on What's Up, Tiger Lily? and other shows and movies mentioned above.  If you want more info, don't forget to order a copy of The Worst We Can Find at a bookstore near you, and there are various eBook versions available if you want to check those out at your favorite online stores as well!


Saturday, May 20, 2023

THE WORST WE CAN FIND - Author Copies Just Arrived!

Just received in the mail my author copies of my new book from Applause, a division of Rowman & Littlefield, The Worst We Can Find.

The book covers the creation and long history of Mystery Science Theater 3000, RiffTrax, and many other offsprings from the original show.  I also cover previous attempts at similar works, such as with J-Men Forever, It Came from Hollywood, What's Up, Tiger Lily?, and the future of such "riffing."  280 pages with many black and white photos (the Kindle version will have many of those in color to view), and available in bookstores June 2023.

Since I got the new one, I thought it would be nice to take a picture of the new one with all 15 of my previous books!

More to come!


Saturday, May 13, 2023

My KISS FAQ ad from 2013

Ten years ago, my publisher Hal Leonard published my third non-fiction book about KISS, KISS FAQ. With that release came the request that I do some type of promotional video for the book that they could put up on their YouTube page.

Of course, this being me, I couldn't just let it go with a proper promotional video and instead decided to turn it into a sketch. Included in this video is my wife Jill, our daughter Maddie, the three children of our friend Sarah, and a special guest appearance from one of the KISS Army originators, Bill Starkey, along with Corky Luther behind the camera and as puppeteer.

Looking back on it, it's over-long and I seemed to be inhabited by the spirit of Weird Al, but we had fun and that's what really matters.  (Wish the basement was as clean as this now, however).

Enjoy!



FOUR SCORES AND SEVEN REELS AGO Reflection - JOHN PAUL JONES (1959)

My book researching Hollywood's movies about the U.S. Presidency, FOUR SCORES AND SEVEN REELS AGO, was released a few weeks back and is available to order in bookstore everywhere!  

To celebrate, I'm taking a look at some of the movies covered therein, such as JOHN PAUL JONES, which was released as Hollywood was beginning to move slightly away from the relevance given to the presidency as seen in films of the 1940s and 1950s.

JOHN PAUL JONES was released by Warner Brothers in 1959. Starring Robert Stack as the man credited as help create the U.S. Navy and famous for the phrase "I have not yet begun to fight" during the American Revolutionary War, the movie was directed by John Farrow and features his daughter Mia Farrow, then 14, in a bit role.

Also featured is that of Peter Cushing in a small role, as well as a cameo by Bette Davis. The film tries its best to be epic and exciting, but while Stack has presence, he never was the most emotive of actors, which makes this a bit of a chore to get through.

Two interesting aspects of the film deal with the presentation of two future presidents.  The first being that of John Adams, played by Robert Ayres (who popped up in many transatlantic television of the 1950s and 1960s). Adams is portrayed in a manner typical of history and the times - that of being boorish and short-sighted; dismissive to Jones and his requests. It wasn't until we got into the 1970s with things like THE ADAMS CHRONICLES and 1776 that Adams began to be represented as something closer to flesh and blood instead of "that mouthbreather between Washington and Jefferson."

More intriguing to me when researching these films was the way John Crawford (another television actor) appears as George Washington. His Washington is only briefly seen, a cameo in order to throw support for Jones and help build him up to the audience as the hero, but what is interesting is how Washington is filmed - never showing his face on-camera, but from behind and with reverence (Stack looks as if he's staring into the face of God rather than Washington in the scene).

That's quite a difference from the way Washington and other presidents had been presented in films up to his point. And Washington was a favorite to appear on camera in some fashion when it came to the movies, even during the early silent days (if you were going to see a president in a film, it was sure to be either Washington or Lincoln). Yet in earlier appearances, if he did appear, you got to see the actor's face. FDR changed that practice when he became proactive in the 1930s in controlling his image in the media. A strongly worded caution by the government towards radio impersonations of the president led to a blanket omission of Roosevelt on the air for a brief time, as least by the impersonators (which included future HONEYMOONER Art Carney at one point).

While radio soon went back to doing the occasional imitation (especially in the MARCH OF TIMES radio series), the movie studios were more cautious. Mention of Roosevelt was fine, but depicting him was another matter and it wasn't until we got to the Three Stooges short, CASH AND CARRY (1938), that we got FDR as a character in a live-action film (albeit a short). There began the traditional manner Roosevelt was to be seen in films - sitting at a desk with his back to the camera. FDR okayed that depiction and it became a tradition (such as how he is seen in YANKEE DOODLE DANDY) for current presidents to be seen in films after that.  Such a status would carry over to Truman and Eisenhower, with JFK breaking the mode by agreeing to Cliff Robertson playing him in PT 109 in 1963.

Thus, while we had been used to seeing Washington on-screen in close-up, the filmmakers of JOHN PAUL JONES film Washington in the manner of FDR - faced away from the camera.  Due to this, it ends up giving the aura of someone being in the room that should not be seen face-to-face; a sense of worship and awe; that we would eventually move away from, but began to connect to the role of the presidency. JOHN PAUL JONES may not have been the first, but it was a solid indicator of our changing admiration for the role of the Founding Fathers and how we began to see the presidency as something "above us." We still haven't shaken that notion completely from our thinking even today. No matter what we may think of whomever is in office. (And more on that topic in the pages of FOUR SCORES AND SEVEN REELS AGO).

Friday, May 12, 2023

SONG TO SOUL Interview Segments - 10th Anniversary


Back in 2013, I was invited to take part in an interview for a Japanese documentary series called SONG TO SOUL, which aired on the BS-TBS television network. The series would focus on one song by a particular artist, following its creation along with a look at the history of the artist and how the song affected their career.

Looking for someone to cover the history a bit more, and with the release of my book KISS FAQ: ALL THAT'S LEFT TO KNOW ABOUT THE HOTTEST BAND IN THE LAND having just occurred, I seemed like a good fit. To accomplish the interview, two members of the production team came out to my house in Louisville, Kentucky to interview me.

In looking at other episodes, I believe they may have expected me to give them some great visuals in the background of my interview with many KISS memorabilia.  And, no doubt, they were probably vastly disappointed when I had nothing to really show beyond the books I had produced for the band, as I had stripped out much of my collection by the time they interviewed me. I was also filmed going to my desk to pretend to write, which I'm sure was thrilling to watch and easily was edited out for any use in the program.

In the end, there evidently was enough to make of use for the program, and I eventually was sent a DVD of the show for my collection from the producers, who were kind enough to make a copy for me. It is interesting to see myself side by side with Gene and Paul in the show. What they may have thought about that (if they bothered at all to watch it), I have no idea.

See for yourself if I did okay. (I'll readily admit that I certainly do love run-on sentences. In my defense, this was all first-takes and I was winging it.)





Wednesday, July 3, 2019

My Essay for the Library of Congress

I was honored to be asked by the Library of Congress to write an essay about Cyndi Lauper's first album, She's So Unusual, which was recently added to the National Registry.

You can read the article here:  https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/national-recording-preservation-board/documents/ShesSoUnusual.pdf